You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiences of person-centred care - patients’ perceptions: qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tariq Saleem J Alharbi, Eric Carlström, Inger Ekman, Anders Jarneborn, Lars-Eric Olsson |
| Abstract |
Patient care models have been implemented and documented worldwide. Many studies have focused on features that hinder and facilitate the shift to such models, including the implementation process, staff involvement, resistance to new models and cultural dimensions. However, few studies have identified the potential effects of such new care models from a patient perspective. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients did in fact perceive the intentions of partnership in the new care model 1 year after its implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#355
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,208
of 257,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.