↓ Skip to main content

More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 224,991)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4265 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0185809
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caspar A. Hallmann, Martin Sorg, Eelke Jongejans, Henk Siepel, Nick Hofland, Heinz Schwan, Werner Stenmans, Andreas Müller, Hubert Sumser, Thomas Hörren, Dave Goulson, Hans de Kroon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,822 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 682 16%
Student > Bachelor 665 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 613 14%
Researcher 540 13%
Other 174 4%
Other 521 12%
Unknown 1070 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1533 36%
Environmental Science 757 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 184 4%
Social Sciences 72 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 2%
Other 385 9%
Unknown 1269 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7457. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#369
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3
of 224,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 337,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1
of 3,649 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,649 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.