↓ Skip to main content

Combustion of dried animal dung as biofuel results in the generation of highly redox active fine particulates

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 627)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combustion of dried animal dung as biofuel results in the generation of highly redox active fine particulates
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2005
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian S Mudway, Sean T Duggan, Chandra Venkataraman, Gazala Habib, Frank J Kelly, Jonathan Grigg

Abstract

The burning of biomass in the developing world for heating and cooking results in high indoor particle concentrations. Long-term exposure to airborne particulate matter (PM) has been associated with increased rates of acute respiratory infections, chronic obstructive lung disease and cancer. In this study we determined the oxidative activity of combustion particles derived from the biomass fuel dung cake by examining their capacity to deplete antioxidants from a model human respiratory tract lining fluid (RTLF). For comparison, the observed oxidative activity was compared with that of particles derived from industrial and vehicular sources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 22%
Engineering 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#956,082
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#37
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,197
of 72,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them