You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A students’ survey of cultural competence as a basis for identifying gaps in the medical curriculum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conny Seeleman, Jessie Hermans, Majda Lamkaddem, Jeanine Suurmond, Karien Stronks, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot |
| Abstract |
Assessing the cultural competence of medical students that have completed the curriculum provides indications on the effectiveness of cultural competence training in that curriculum. However, existing measures for cultural competence mostly rely on self-perceived cultural competence. This paper describes the outcomes of an assessment of knowledge, reflection ability and self-reported culturally competent consultation behaviour, the relation between these assessments and self-perceived cultural competence, and the applicability of the results in the light of developing a cultural competence educational programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,307,723
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,256
of 3,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,898
of 256,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#36
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.