↓ Skip to main content

Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Murphy, Ronan O'Sullivan, Abel Wakai, Timothy S Grant, Michael J Barrett, John Cronin, Siobhan C McCoy, Jeffrey Hom, Nandini Kandamany

Abstract

Pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting; however, timely management of acute pain in children continues to be suboptimal. Intranasal drug delivery has emerged as an alternative method of achieving quicker drug delivery without adding to the distress of a child by inserting an intravenous cannula.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Unspecified 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 42%
Unspecified 28 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#417,763
of 13,644,623 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,208
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,814
of 212,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.