↓ Skip to main content

Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Murphy, Ronan O'Sullivan, Abel Wakai, Timothy S Grant, Michael J Barrett, John Cronin, Siobhan C McCoy, Jeffrey Hom, Nandini Kandamany

Abstract

Pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting; however, timely management of acute pain in children continues to be suboptimal. Intranasal drug delivery has emerged as an alternative method of achieving quicker drug delivery without adding to the distress of a child by inserting an intravenous cannula.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 211 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 58 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#600,068
of 17,979,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,442
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,272
of 220,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,979,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.