↓ Skip to main content

Locally epistatic models for genome-wide prediction and association by importance sampling

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locally epistatic models for genome-wide prediction and association by importance sampling
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12711-017-0348-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deniz Akdemir, Jean-Luc Jannink, Julio Isidro-Sánchez

Abstract

In statistical genetics, an important task involves building predictive models of the genotype-phenotype relationship to attribute a proportion of the total phenotypic variance to the variation in genotypes. Many models have been proposed to incorporate additive genetic effects into prediction or association models. Currently, there is a scarcity of models that can adequately account for gene by gene or other forms of genetic interactions, and there is an increased interest in using marker annotations in genome-wide prediction and association analyses. In this paper, we discuss a hybrid modeling method which combines parametric mixed modeling and non-parametric rule ensembles. This approach gives us a flexible class of models that can be used to capture additive, locally epistatic genetic effects, gene-by-background interactions and allows us to incorporate one or more annotations into the genomic selection or association models. We use benchmark datasets that cover a range of organisms and traits in addition to simulated datasets to illustrate the strengths of this approach. In this paper, we describe a new strategy for incorporating genetic interactions into genomic prediction and association models. This strategy results in accurate models, with sometimes significantly higher accuracies than that of a standard additive model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#640
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,566
of 335,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.