You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Androgens for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006881.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qianchun Yang, Minawaer Abudou, Xi Sheng Xie, Taixiang Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 20% |
| Unknown | 72 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,264,158
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,177
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,187
of 267,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.