↓ Skip to main content

A liquid metal reaction environment for the room-temperature synthesis of atomically thin metal oxides

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
A liquid metal reaction environment for the room-temperature synthesis of atomically thin metal oxides
Published in
Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aao4249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Zavabeti, Jian Zhen Ou, Benjamin J. Carey, Nitu Syed, Rebecca Orrell-Trigg, Edwin L. H. Mayes, Chenglong Xu, Omid Kavehei, Anthony P. O’Mullane, Richard B. Kaner, Kourosh Kalantar-zadeh, Torben Daeneke

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) oxides have a wide variety of applications in electronics and other technologies. However, many oxides are not easy to synthesize as 2D materials through conventional methods. We used nontoxic eutectic gallium-based alloys as a reaction solvent and co-alloyed desired metals into the melt. On the basis of thermodynamic considerations, we predicted the composition of the self-limiting interfacial oxide. We isolated the surface oxide as a 2D layer, either on substrates or in suspension. This enabled us to produce extremely thin subnanometer layers of HfO2, Al2O3, and Gd2O3 The liquid metal-based reaction route can be used to create 2D materials that were previously inaccessible with preexisting methods. The work introduces room-temperature liquid metals as a reaction environment for the synthesis of oxide nanomaterials with low dimensionality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 241 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 29%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Professor 15 6%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 29 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 64 27%
Chemistry 50 21%
Engineering 29 12%
Physics and Astronomy 26 11%
Chemical Engineering 11 5%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 46 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2018.
All research outputs
#76,227
of 14,061,361 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,255
of 63,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,646
of 317,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#166
of 1,066 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,061,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,066 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.