↓ Skip to main content

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
454 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
673 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth

Abstract

Interactive Health Communication Applications (IHCAs) are computer-based, usually web-based, information packages for patients that combine health information with at least one of social support, decision support, or behaviour change support. These are innovations in health care and their effects on health are uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Canada 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Norway 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 609 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 18%
Researcher 119 18%
Student > Master 104 15%
Student > Bachelor 64 10%
Other 36 5%
Other 159 24%
Unknown 67 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 30%
Psychology 89 13%
Social Sciences 68 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 9%
Computer Science 47 7%
Other 104 15%
Unknown 101 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,420,786
of 13,377,075 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,017
of 10,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,239
of 92,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,377,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.