↓ Skip to main content

A cognitive perspective on health systems integration: results of a Canadian Delphi study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cognitive perspective on health systems integration: results of a Canadian Delphi study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna M Evans, G Ross Baker, Whitney Berta, Jan Barnsley

Abstract

Ongoing challenges to healthcare integration point toward the need to move beyond structural and process issues. While we know what needs to be done to achieve integrated care, there is little that informs us as to how. We need to understand how diverse organizations and professionals develop shared knowledge and beliefs - that is, we need to generate knowledge about normative integration. We present a cognitive perspective on integration, based on shared mental model theory, that may enhance our understanding and ability to measure and influence normative integration. The aim of this paper is to validate and improve the Mental Models of Integrated Care (MMIC) Framework, which outlines important knowledge and beliefs whose convergence or divergence across stakeholder groups may influence inter-professional and inter-organizational relations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 18 20%