You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New oral anticoagulants: discussion on monitoring and adherence should start now!
|
---|---|
Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-9560-11-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hugo ten Cate |
Abstract |
New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been introduced to improve anticoagulant therapy worldwide, but safe implementation may require additional measures. First, optimization of dose adjustment based on therapeutic levels of the drug may be more appropriate than fixed dose therapy. The development and implementation in quantitative laboratory assays will enable further dose optimization. Second, non-adherence to medication is a potential threat to the safe use of NOACs. Since cardiovascular medication may not be optimally used in about 50% of patients, procedures to improve adherence are imperative, also for NOAC therapy and in particular in elderly patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 20 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 56% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 16% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,407,565
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#96
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,831
of 207,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.