↓ Skip to main content

Global aspirations, local realities: the role of social science research in controlling neglected tropical diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global aspirations, local realities: the role of social science research in controlling neglected tropical diseases
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-9957-3-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Bardosh

Abstract

Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) are both drivers and manifestations of poverty and social inequality. Increased advocacy efforts since the mid-2000s have led to ambitious new control and elimination targets set for 2020 by the World Health Organisation. While these global aspirations represent significant policy momentum, there are multifaceted challenges in controlling infectious diseases in resource-poor local contexts that need to be acknowledged, understood and engaged. However a number of recent publications have emphasised the "neglected" status of applied social science research on NTDs. In light of the 2020 targets, this paper explores the social science/NTD literature and unpacks some of the ways in which social inquiry can help support effective and sustainable interventions. Five priority areas are discussed, including on policy processes, health systems capacity, compliance and resistance to interventions, education and behaviour change, and community participation. The paper shows that despite the multifaceted value of having anthropological and sociological perspectives integrated into NTD programmes, contemporary efforts underutilise this potential. This is reflective of the dominance of top-down information flows and technocratic approaches in global health. To counter this tendency, social research needs to be more than an afterthought; integrating social inquiry into the planning, monitoring and evaluating process will help ensure that flexibility and adaptability to local realities are built into interventions. More emphasis on social science perspectives can also help link NTD control to broader social determinants of health, especially important given the major social and economic inequalities that continue to underpin transmission in endemic countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 19%
Social Sciences 34 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 57 26%