↓ Skip to main content

The strange case of East African annual fishes: aridification correlates with diversification for a savannah aquatic group?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The strange case of East African annual fishes: aridification correlates with diversification for a savannah aquatic group?
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12862-014-0210-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Dorn, Zuzana Musilová, Matthias Platzer, Kathrin Reichwald, Alessandro Cellerino

Abstract

Annual Nothobranchius fishes are distributed in East and Southern Africa and inhabit ephemeral pools filled during the monsoon season. Nothobranchius show extreme life-history adaptations: embryos survive by entering diapause and they are the vertebrates with the fastest maturation and the shortest lifespan. The distribution of Nothobranchius overlaps with the East Africa Rift System. The geological and paleoclimatic history of this region is known in detail: in particular, aridification of East Africa and expansion of grassland habitats started 8 Mya and three humid periods between 3 and 1 Mya are superimposed on the longer-term aridification. These climatic oscillations are thought to have shaped evolution of savannah African mammals. We reconstructed the phylogeny of Nothobranchius and dated the different stages of diversification in relation to these paleoclimatic events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 55%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,778
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,860
of 268,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#28
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.