↓ Skip to main content

Effects of low-density feeding on elk-fetus contact rates on Wyoming feedgrounds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of low-density feeding on elk-fetus contact rates on Wyoming feedgrounds
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.331
Authors

Tyler G. Creech, Paul C. Cross, Brandon M. Scurlock, Eric J. Maichak, Jared D. Rogerson, John C. Henningsen, Scott Creel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 74%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,629,761
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#533
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,038
of 238,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.