↓ Skip to main content

Reexamination of the magnitudes for the 1906 and 1922 Chilean earthquakes using Japanese tsunami amplitudes: Implications for source depth constraints

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reexamination of the magnitudes for the 1906 and 1922 Chilean earthquakes using Japanese tsunami amplitudes: Implications for source depth constraints
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jb013269
Authors

M. Carvajal, M. Cisternas, A. Gubler, P. A. Catalán, P. Winckler, R. L. Wesson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 50%
Engineering 5 28%
Psychology 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,445,940
of 14,559,006 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#612
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,469
of 318,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#37
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,559,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.