↓ Skip to main content

Reexamination of the magnitudes for the 1906 and 1922 Chilean earthquakes using Japanese tsunami amplitudes: Implications for source depth constraints

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reexamination of the magnitudes for the 1906 and 1922 Chilean earthquakes using Japanese tsunami amplitudes: Implications for source depth constraints
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016jb013269
Authors

M. Carvajal, M. Cisternas, A. Gubler, P. A. Catalán, P. Winckler, R. L. Wesson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 50%
Engineering 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,626,218
of 12,491,880 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#430
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,722
of 311,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,491,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.