↓ Skip to main content

Software and the Scientist: Coding and Citation Practices in Geodynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Earth and Space Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 107)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Software and the Scientist: Coding and Citation Practices in Geodynamics
Published in
Earth and Space Science, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016ea000225
Authors

Lorraine Hwang, Allison Fish, Laura Soito, MacKenzie Smith, Louise H. Kellogg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 31%
Unspecified 4 25%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Other 3 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#511,286
of 12,471,096 outputs
Outputs from Earth and Space Science
#13
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,250
of 309,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth and Space Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,471,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them