↓ Skip to main content

Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators

Overview of attention for article published in International Breastfeeding Journal, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators
Published in
International Breastfeeding Journal, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-4358-9-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ted Greiner

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is complicated by factors related to definitions, timing, duration of recall, methods of analysis, and sample biases. Clearly prospective methods are likely to be more accurate but are too expensive to use in most large-scale surveys. Internationally, most surveys use a point-in-time or current status measurement (usually 24-hour recall) and report their findings using an indicator established by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 1991 that involves combining all babies less than six months old in order to obtain a large enough sample size to result in stable proportions that can be compared over time. However, this indicator is complex to understand and explain and is widely misunderstood, even within the breastfeeding community. It is commonly cited in ways that greatly exaggerate how common exclusive breastfeeding actually is.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Niger 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Researcher 14 6%
Lecturer 14 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 22%
Social Sciences 18 7%
Psychology 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,188,964
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from International Breastfeeding Journal
#107
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,620
of 272,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Breastfeeding Journal
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.