↓ Skip to main content

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004293.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yizhi Chen, Arrigo Schieppati, Xiangmei Chen, Guangyan Cai, Javier Zamora, Giovanni A Giuliano, Norbert Braun, Annalisa Perna

Abstract

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease shows a benign or indolent course in the majority of patients, with a rate of spontaneous complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome as high as 30% or more. Despite this, 30% to 40% of patients progress toward end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within five to 15 years. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for IMN with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 10 9%
Other 31 26%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,230,443
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,573
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,493
of 228,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.