You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risks and drivers of wild bird feeding in urban areas of New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.038 |
| Authors |
Josie A. Galbraith, Jacqueline R. Beggs, Darryl N. Jones, Ellery J. McNaughton, Cheryl R. Krull, Margaret C. Stanley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
| Scientists | 11 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,116,920
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#969
of 6,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,073
of 371,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.