↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Shear Strength Along Subduction Faults

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging Shear Strength Along Subduction Faults
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075501
Authors

Quentin Bletery, Amanda M. Thomas, Alan W. Rempel, Jeanne L. Hardebeck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 45%
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 95%
Engineering 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#11,396,317
of 12,819,002 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#9,670
of 12,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,196
of 313,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#229
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.