You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CHRODIS criteria applied to the MASK (MACVIA‐ARIA Sentinel NetworK) Good Practice in allergic rhinitis: a SUNFRAIL report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-017-0173-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Bousquet, G. L. Onorato, C. Bachert, M. Barbolini, A. Bedbrook, L. Bjermer, J. Correia de Sousa, N. H. Chavannes, A. A. Cruz, E. De Manuel Keenoy, P. Devillier, J. Fonseca, S. Hun, T. Kostka, P. W. Hellings, M. Illario, J. C. Ivancevich, D. Larenas-Linnemann, J. Millot-Keurinck, D. Ryan, B. Samolinski, A. Sheikh, A. Yorgancioglu, I. Agache, S. Arnavielhe, M. Bewick, I. Annesi-Maesano, J. M. Anto, K. C. Bergmann, C. Bindslev-Jensen, S. Bosnic-Anticevich, J. Bouchard, D. P. Caimmi, P. Camargos, G. W. Canonica, V. Cardona, A. M. Carriazo, C. Cingi, E. Colgan, A. Custovic, R. Dahl, P. Demoly, G. De Vries, W. J. Fokkens, J. F. Fontaine, B. Gemicioğlu, N. Guldemond, Z. Gutter, T. Haahtela, B. Hellqvist-Dahl, E. Jares, G. Joos, J. Just, N. Khaltaev, T. Keil, L. Klimek, M. L. Kowalski, I. Kull, P. Kuna, V. Kvedariene, D. Laune, R. Louis, A. Magnan, J. Malva, E. Mathieu-Dupas, E. Melén, E. Menditto, M. Morais-Almeida, R. Mösges, J. Mullol, R. Murray, H. Neffen, R. O’Hehir, S. Palkonen, N. G. Papadopoulos, G. Passalacqua, J. L. Pépin, F. Portejoie, D. Price, B. Pugin, F. Raciborski, F. E. R. Simons, M. Sova, O. Spranger, C. Stellato, A. Todo Bom, P. V. Tomazic, M. Triggiani, A. Valero, E. Valovirta, O. VandenPlas, A. Valiulis, M. van Eerd, M. T. Ventura, M. Wickman, I. Young, T. Zuberbier, A. Zurkuhlen, A. Senn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 5 | 18% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,868,504
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#79
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,417
of 342,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.