↓ Skip to main content

An Asian perspective on early human dispersal from Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
connotea
4 Connotea
Title
An Asian perspective on early human dispersal from Africa
Published in
Nature, December 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature04259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Dennell, Wil Roebroeks

Abstract

The past decade has seen the Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil hominin record enriched by the addition of at least ten new taxa, including the Early Pleistocene, small-brained hominins from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the diminutive Late Pleistocene Homo floresiensis from Flores, Indonesia. At the same time, Asia's earliest hominin presence has been extended up to 1.8 Myr ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than previously envisaged. Nevertheless, the preferred explanation for the first appearance of hominins outside Africa has remained virtually unchanged. We show here that it is time to develop alternatives to one of palaeoanthropology's most basic paradigms: 'Out of Africa 1'.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 12 3%
United States 8 2%
Germany 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 401 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 21%
Researcher 93 21%
Student > Master 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Professor 34 8%
Other 125 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 30%
Social Sciences 86 19%
Arts and Humanities 75 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 71 16%
Unspecified 31 7%
Other 51 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#171,388
of 13,210,683 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,837
of 68,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,512
of 231,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#320
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,210,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.