↓ Skip to main content

An Asian perspective on early human dispersal from Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
534 Mendeley
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Asian perspective on early human dispersal from Africa
Published in
Nature, December 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature04259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Dennell, Wil Roebroeks

Abstract

The past decade has seen the Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil hominin record enriched by the addition of at least ten new taxa, including the Early Pleistocene, small-brained hominins from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the diminutive Late Pleistocene Homo floresiensis from Flores, Indonesia. At the same time, Asia's earliest hominin presence has been extended up to 1.8 Myr ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than previously envisaged. Nevertheless, the preferred explanation for the first appearance of hominins outside Africa has remained virtually unchanged. We show here that it is time to develop alternatives to one of palaeoanthropology's most basic paradigms: 'Out of Africa 1'.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 12 2%
United States 7 1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 492 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 106 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 19%
Student > Master 63 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 11%
Professor 40 7%
Other 122 23%
Unknown 44 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 138 26%
Social Sciences 101 19%
Arts and Humanities 95 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 77 14%
Environmental Science 21 4%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 62 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#392,581
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#19,535
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#743
of 161,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#21
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.