↓ Skip to main content

Induction of anesthesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the hemodynamic and analgesic effects of ketamine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of anesthesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the hemodynamic and analgesic effects of ketamine
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010000200003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elif Basagan-Mogo, Suna Goren, Gulsen Korfali, Gurkan Turker, Fatma Nur Kaya

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the hemodynamic and analgesic effects of ketamine by comparing it with propofol starting at the induction of anesthesia until the end of sternotomy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,805,575
of 11,441,779 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#251
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,098
of 209,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,441,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.