↓ Skip to main content

Questionnaires on satisfaction of amplification in children: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Questionnaires on satisfaction of amplification in children: a systematic review
Published in
CoDAS, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/s2317-17822014000100011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriane Lima Mortari Moret, Maria Cecilia Bevilacqua, Tatiana Mendes de Melo, Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli, Maria Angelina Nardi de Souza Martinez, Aline Duarte da Cruz, Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob

Abstract

To perform a systematic review of the literature on questionnaires to assess the benefits of using hearing aids in children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#9,694,742
of 12,124,130 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#72
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,287
of 227,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,124,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.