↓ Skip to main content

Identification of risk groups for oropharyngeal dysphagia in hospitalized patients in a university hospital

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of risk groups for oropharyngeal dysphagia in hospitalized patients in a university hospital
Published in
CoDAS, February 2014
DOI 10.1590/s2317-17822014000100004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daiane Bassi, Ana Maria Furkim, Cristiane Alves Silva, Mara Sérgia Pacheco Honório Coelho, Maria Rita Pimenta Rolim, Maria Luiza Aires de Alencar, Marcos José Machado

Abstract

To assess the characteristics of P1 component in children presented with pre-lingual hearing loss, users of cochlear implants, and correlate them with speech perception performance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Other 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,897,616
of 19,118,428 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#275
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,859
of 247,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,118,428 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.