You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reconstructing the Diversification of α-Esterases: Comparing the Gene Clusters of Drosophila buzzatii and D. melanogaster
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s002390010075 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G. Charles de Q. Robin, Charles Claudianos, Robyn J. Russell, John G. Oakeshott |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 3 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 70% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2010.
All research outputs
#4,752,673
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#241
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,812
of 37,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.