↓ Skip to main content

Erythropoiesis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Erythropoiesis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Introduction to Erythropoiesis Approaches
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Using the Zebrafish as an Approach to Examine the Mechanisms of Vertebrate Erythropoiesis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Mouse Models of Erythropoiesis and Associated Diseases
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Dissecting Regulatory Mechanisms Using Mouse Fetal Liver-Derived Erythroid Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Stress Erythropoiesis Model Systems
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Approaches for Analysis of Erythroid Cell Parameters and Hemoglobinopathies in Mouse Models
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Functional Analysis of Erythroid Progenitors by Colony-Forming Assays
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analyzing the Formation, Morphology, and Integrity of Erythroblastic Islands
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Flow Cytometry (FCM) Analysis and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Erythroid Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of Erythropoiesis Using Imaging Flow Cytometry
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Flow Cytometric Analysis of Erythroblast Enucleation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 High-Resolution Fluorescence Microscope Imaging of Erythroblast Structure
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with Erythroid Samples
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C and Higher) with Erythroid Samples
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Genome Editing of Erythroid Cell Culture Model Systems
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vitro Erythroid Differentiation and Lentiviral Knockdown in Human CD34+ Cells from Umbilical Cord Blood
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Growing and Genetically Manipulating Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Erythroid Progenitor (HUDEP) Cell Lines
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Translation of Advanced Cellular Therapeutics: Lessons for the Manufacture of Erythrocytes as Medicinal Products
Attention for Chapter 9: Flow Cytometry (FCM) Analysis and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Erythroid Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Flow Cytometry (FCM) Analysis and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Erythroid Cells
Chapter number 9
Book title
Erythropoiesis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7428-3_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7427-6, 978-1-4939-7428-3
Authors

Xiuli An, Lixiang Chen

Abstract

To study the process of erythropoiesis, it is important to be able to isolate erythroid progenitors and erythroblasts at distinct stages of development. During the past decade, considerable progress has been made on the development of flow cytometry (FCM) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) methods for the analysis and isolation of both murine and human erythroid cells at distinct stages of erythropoiesis, based on changes in the expression of cell surface markers. A method for the identification of murine BFU-E and CFU-E cells was reported by Flygare et al., by negative selection for Ter119, B220, Mac-1, CD3, Gr1, Sca-1, CD16/CD32, CD41, and CD34 cells, followed by separation based on the expression levels of CD71. We developed an alternative method in which Ter119 is used as an erythroid lineage marker, and in conjunction with CD44 and cell size as differentiation markers, it is possible to unambiguously distinguish erythroblasts at each developmental stage during murine terminal erythroid differentiation. We also developed methods for the analysis and isolation of human erythroid cells at all developmental stages. BFU-E and CFU-E are characterized by CD45(+)GPA(-)IL-3R(-)CD34(+)CD36(-)CD71(low) and CD45(+)GPA(-)IL-3R(-)CD34(-)CD36(+)CD71(high) phenotypes, respectively; the combination of GPA, band 3 and α4-integrin are used to isolate erythroid cells at all of the terminal stages of human erythropoiesis, including proerythroblasts, early basophilic, late basophilic, polychromatic and orthochromatic erythroblasts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 22 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,957,541
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,728
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,656
of 442,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#508
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.