Title |
Sharks, rays and abortion: The prevalence of capture-induced parturition in elasmobranchs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.010 |
Authors |
Kye R. Adams, Lachlan C. Fetterplace, Andrew R. Davis, Matthew D. Taylor, Nathan A. Knott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 31 | 16% |
Australia | 25 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 12 | 6% |
South Africa | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 5 | 3% |
Indonesia | 3 | 2% |
Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
Philippines | 2 | 1% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Other | 24 | 13% |
Unknown | 80 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 133 | 69% |
Scientists | 50 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 15% |
Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 29 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 64 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#161,969
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#93
of 6,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,575
of 452,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.