↓ Skip to main content

Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
80 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
570 X users
facebook
54 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
585 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1410465111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Barry W. Brook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 570 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 585 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 552 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 18%
Researcher 97 17%
Student > Master 95 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 5%
Other 96 16%
Unknown 103 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 26%
Environmental Science 121 21%
Social Sciences 42 7%
Engineering 21 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 3%
Other 109 19%
Unknown 123 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#13,261
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#419
of 103,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64
of 274,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.