↓ Skip to main content

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007419.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virgili G, Parravano M, Menchini F, Evans JR, Virgili, Gianni, Parravano, Mariacristina, Menchini, Francesca, Evans, Jennifer R

Abstract

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a common complication of diabetic retinopathy. Although grid or focal laser photocoagulation has been shown to reduce the risk of visual loss in DMO, or clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO), vision is rarely improved. Antiangiogenic therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) modalities is used to try to improve vision in people with DMO.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 51 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 60%
Unspecified 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 19 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,118,637
of 13,213,187 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,449
of 10,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,473
of 232,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,213,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.