↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Research Review: Birth by caesarean section and development of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 3,112)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Policy documents Twitter Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research Review: Birth by caesarean section and development of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12351
Pubmed ID
25348074
Authors

Eileen A. Curran, Sinéad M. O'Neill, John F. Cryan, Louise C. Kenny, Timothy G. Dinan, Ali S. Khashan, Patricia M. Kearney

Abstract

Given the growing prevalence of birth by Caesarean section (CS) worldwide, it is important to understand any long-term effects CS delivery may have on a child's development. We assessed the impact of mode of delivery on autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 26%
Psychology 35 14%
Neuroscience 21 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 75 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#96,138
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#32
of 3,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#913
of 261,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.