You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Eligibility determination for clinical trials: development of a case review process at a chiropractic research center
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-406 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert D. Vining, Stacie A. Salsbury, Katherine A. Pohlman |
Abstract |
Systematic procedures addressing the limitations of eligibility determination are needed to improve the quality of participant recruitment and enrollment in randomized clinical trials. This paper describes an eligibility determination process developed by and in use at a chiropractic research center engaged in community recruitment for clinical trials studying spinal pain conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,565,847
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#15
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,553
of 275,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.