↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use

Overview of attention for article published in Cities, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use
Published in
Cities, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.003
Authors

Dong Wang, Gregory Brown, Yan Liu, Iderlina Mateo-Babiano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 27%
Environmental Science 23 20%
Unspecified 15 13%
Design 10 9%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,002,340
of 11,842,911 outputs
Outputs from Cities
#104
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,870
of 210,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cities
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,842,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.