↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use

Overview of attention for article published in Cities, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use
Published in
Cities, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.003
Authors

Dong Wang, Gregory Brown, Yan Liu, Iderlina Mateo-Babiano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 265 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 66 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 56 21%
Environmental Science 39 14%
Design 17 6%
Engineering 17 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 81 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,818,525
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cities
#1,195
of 1,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,678
of 367,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cities
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.