↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the potential association between brominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, phthalates, and bisphenol a in polycystic ovary…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the potential association between brominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, phthalates, and bisphenol a in polycystic ovary syndrome: a case–control study
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6823-14-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara J Vagi, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Andreas Sjödin, Antonia M Calafat, Daniel Dumesic, Leonardo Gonzalez, Kayoko Kato, Manori J Silva, Xiaoyun Ye, Ricardo Azziz

Abstract

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that affects approximately 6-10% of women of child-bearing age. Although preliminary studies suggest that certain pollutants may act as endocrine disruptors in animals, little is known about their potential association with PCOS. The objective of this case-control pilot study is to determine whether women with PCOS have higher concentrations of specific environmental contaminants compared to women who have not developed PCOS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 12 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Environmental Science 21 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 66 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,462,339
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#122
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,849
of 277,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.