↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Changes in the Asian Summer Monsoon over the Past Millennium: Insights from a Long-Term Coupled Model Simulation*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Climate, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Changes in the Asian Summer Monsoon over the Past Millennium: Insights from a Long-Term Coupled Model Simulation*
Published in
Journal of Climate, April 2009
DOI 10.1175/2008jcli2336.1
Authors

Fangxing Fan, Michael E. Mann, Caspar M. Ammann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 49%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Engineering 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#3,863
of 7,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,309
of 94,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#34
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.