↓ Skip to main content

The 15th century Arctic warming in coupled model simulations with data assimilation

Overview of attention for article published in Climate of the Past, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
The 15th century Arctic warming in coupled model simulations with data assimilation
Published in
Climate of the Past, July 2009
DOI 10.5194/cp-5-389-2009
Authors

E. Crespin, H. Goosse, T. Fichefet, M. E. Mann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 50%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Climate of the Past
#526
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,612
of 111,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate of the Past
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.