↓ Skip to main content

Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development?
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman M. Stilling, Seth R. Bordenstein, Timothy G. Dinan, John F. Cryan

Abstract

The tight association of the human body with trillions of colonizing microbes that we observe today is the result of a long evolutionary history. Only very recently have we started to understand how this symbiosis also affects brain function and behavior. In this hypothesis and theory article, we propose how host-microbe associations potentially influenced mammalian brain evolution and development. In particular, we explore the integration of human brain development with evolution, symbiosis, and RNA biology, which together represent a "social triangle" that drives human social behavior and cognition. We argue that, in order to understand how inter-kingdom communication can affect brain adaptation and plasticity, it is inevitable to consider epigenetic mechanisms as important mediators of genome-microbiome interactions on an individual as well as a transgenerational time scale. Finally, we unite these interpretations with the hologenome theory of evolution. Taken together, we propose a tighter integration of neuroscience fields with host-associated microbiology by taking an evolutionary perspective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 350 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 19%
Researcher 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 62 17%
Student > Master 51 14%
Other 14 4%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 9%
Neuroscience 23 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 5%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 65 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#614,881
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#82
of 6,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,310
of 261,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.