↓ Skip to main content

Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Marie Desmartis, Thomas Poder, William Witteman

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly performed at the local or hospital level where the costs, impacts, and benefits of health technologies can be directly assessed. Although local/hospital-based HTA has been implemented for more than two decades in some jurisdictions, little is known about its effects and impact on hospital budget, clinical practices, and patient outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review that aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the effects and impact of local/hospital-based HTA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 8%
Engineering 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,098,984
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#856
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,628
of 260,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.