↓ Skip to main content

Aquatic exercise training for fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aquatic exercise training for fibromyalgia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Bidonde, Angela J Busch, Sandra C Webber, Candice L Schachter, Adrienne Danyliw, Tom J Overend, Rachel S Richards, Tamara Rader

Abstract

Exercise training is commonly recommended for individuals with fibromyalgia. This review examined the effects of supervised group aquatic training programs (led by an instructor). We defined aquatic training as exercising in a pool while standing at waist, chest, or shoulder depth. This review is part of the update of the 'Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome' review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 499 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 21%
Student > Bachelor 91 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Student > Postgraduate 42 8%
Researcher 37 7%
Other 113 22%
Unknown 67 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 183 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 18%
Sports and Recreations 38 7%
Psychology 27 5%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 90 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#299,721
of 14,593,447 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#735
of 11,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,509
of 231,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,593,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.