You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using Principles of Co-Production to Improve Patient Care and Enhance Value
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.pfor1-1711 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Puja Turakhia, Brandon Combs |
Abstract |
Unlike goods, which are concrete and easily quantified, services are intangible processes that are produced and consumed concurrently. Health care is a service that can encourage optimal health outcomes only through meaningful, collaborative partnerships between patients and clinicians. Co-production of health services can be used as a means to rethink how health care is delivered not only in the context of face-to-face encounters in which the benefits of working together are obvious, but also in designing systems that can improve patient care and enhance value. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Oman | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
Scientists | 7 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
Psychology | 7 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,346,964
of 26,499,616 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#404
of 2,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,401
of 345,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,499,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.