↓ Skip to main content

Fungal biology in the post-genomic era

Overview of attention for article published in Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fungal biology in the post-genomic era
Published in
Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40694-014-0007-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Scazzocchio

Abstract

In this review I give a personal perspective of how fungal biology has changed since I started my Ph. D. in 1963. At that time we were working in the shadow of the birth of molecular biology as an autonomous and reductionistic discipline, embodied in Crick's central dogma. This first period was methodologically characterised by the fact that we knew what genes were, but we could not access them directly. This radically changed in the 70s-80s when gene cloning, reverse genetics and DNA sequencing become possible. The "next generation" sequencing techniques have produced a further qualitative revolutionary change. The ready access to genomes and transcriptomes of any microbial organism allows old questions to be asked in a radically different way and new questions to be approached. I provide examples chosen somewhat arbitrarily to illustrate some of these changes, from applied aspects to fundamental problems such as the origin of fungal specific genes, the evolutionary history of genes clusters and the realisation of the pervasiveness of horizontal transmission. Finally, I address how the ready availability of genomes and transcriptomes could change the status of model organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 111 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 27%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,072,573
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
#84
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,823
of 257,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.