↓ Skip to main content

Primary headaches interfere with the efficacy of temporomandibular disorders management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 183)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary headaches interfere with the efficacy of temporomandibular disorders management
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science
DOI 10.1590/1678-775720130557
Authors

PORPORATTI, André Luís, COSTA, Yuri Martins, CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues, BONJARDIM, Leonardo Rigoldi, CALDERON, Patrícia dos Santos, PORPORATTI, André Luís, COSTA, Yuri Martins, CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues, BONJARDIM, Leonardo Rigoldi, CALDERON, Patrícia dos Santos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,521,680
of 12,280,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#31
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,634
of 227,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,280,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them