↓ Skip to main content

Through the Quarantine Looking Glass: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Public Health Governance, Law, and Ethics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,001)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Through the Quarantine Looking Glass: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Public Health Governance, Law, and Ethics
Published in
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00185.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Fidler, Lawrence O. Gostin, Howard Markel

Abstract

The incident in May-June 2007 involving a U.S. citizen traveling internationally while infected with drug-resistant tuberculosis involved the U.S. federal government's application of its quarantine and isolation powers. The incident and the isolation order raised numerous important issues for public health governance, law, and ethics. This article explores many of these issues by examining how the exercise of quarantine powers provides a powerful lens through which to understand how societies respond to and attempt to govern threats posed by dangerous, contagious pathogens. The article considers historical aspects of governmental power to quarantine and isolate individuals and groups; analyzes the current state of quarantine and isolation law in the United States in light of the recent incident with drug-resistant tuberculosis; and explores global aspects of public health governance and law highlighted by this incident.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Brazil 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Social Sciences 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#93,135
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#5
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,269
of 238,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them