| Title |
Discovery of a big void in Khufu’s Pyramid by observation of cosmic-ray muons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature24647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kunihiro Morishima, Mitsuaki Kuno, Akira Nishio, Nobuko Kitagawa, Yuta Manabe, Masaki Moto, Fumihiko Takasaki, Hirofumi Fujii, Kotaro Satoh, Hideyo Kodama, Kohei Hayashi, Shigeru Odaka, Sébastien Procureur, David Attié, Simon Bouteille, Denis Calvet, Christopher Filosa, Patrick Magnier, Irakli Mandjavidze, Marc Riallot, Benoit Marini, Pierre Gable, Yoshikatsu Date, Makiko Sugiura, Yasser Elshayeb, Tamer Elnady, Mustapha Ezzy, Emmanuel Guerriero, Vincent Steiger, Nicolas Serikoff, Jean-Baptiste Mouret, Bernard Charlès, Hany Helal, Mehdi Tayoubi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,264 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 282 | 12% |
| Japan | 241 | 11% |
| Spain | 100 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 68 | 3% |
| France | 60 | 3% |
| Mexico | 52 | 2% |
| Canada | 32 | 1% |
| Colombia | 23 | 1% |
| Germany | 19 | <1% |
| Other | 242 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1145 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2018 | 89% |
| Scientists | 177 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 40 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 72 | 27% |
| Engineering | 24 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 22% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2906. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,364
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#245
of 98,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 342,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.