↓ Skip to main content

How Co-Creation Helped Address Hierarchy, Overwhelmed Patients, and Conflicts of Interest in Health Care Quality and Safety

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Co-Creation Helped Address Hierarchy, Overwhelmed Patients, and Conflicts of Interest in Health Care Quality and Safety
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, November 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.11.mhst1-1711
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Co-creation is health professionals' and systems' development of health care together with patients and families. Such collaborations yield an exchange of values, ideas, and priorities that can individualize care for each patient. Co-creation has been discussed interchangeably with co-production and shared decision making; this article explores co-creation through the lens of quality improvement. Although there are barriers to co-creation including physician autonomy, patient overwhelm, and conflicts of interest, co-creation has been shown to promote patient engagement, peer learning, and improved outcomes. Further research is needed in co-creation for systems improvement.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Unspecified 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 21 34%