↓ Skip to main content

Novel features of early burst suppression predict outcome after birth asphyxia.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel features of early burst suppression predict outcome after birth asphyxia.
Published in
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/acn3.32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kartik K Iyer, James A Roberts, Marjo Metsäranta, Simon Finnigan, Michael Breakspear, Sampsa Vanhatalo, Iyer KK, Roberts JA, Metsäranta M, Finnigan S, Breakspear M, Vanhatalo S, Kartik K. Iyer, James A. Roberts

Abstract

Burst suppression patterns in the electroencephalogram are a reliable marker of recent severe brain insult. Here we analyze statistical properties of bursts occurring in 20 electroencephalographic recordings acquired from hypothermic asphyxic newborns in the hours immediately following birth. We show that the distributions of burst area and duration in these acute data predict later clinical outcome in both structural neuroimaging and neurodevelopment. Our findings indicate the first early electroencephalographic metrics that offer outcome prediction in asphyxic neonates undergoing hypothermia treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Unspecified 4 14%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 7 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,552,509
of 5,036,385 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#151
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,806
of 143,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,036,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.