↓ Skip to main content

Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003039.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Mhaskar, Otavio Augusto Camara Clark, Gary Lyman, Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel, Luciano Morganti Paladini, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Researcher 17 14%
Other 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Unspecified 13 10%
Other 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 58%
Unspecified 22 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 10 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,400,429
of 13,588,841 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,183
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,314
of 232,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,588,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.