↓ Skip to main content

Dose of early intervention treatment during children’s first 36 months of life is associated with developmental outcomes: an observational cohort study in three low/low-middle income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dose of early intervention treatment during children’s first 36 months of life is associated with developmental outcomes: an observational cohort study in three low/low-middle income countries
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-14-281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan L Wallander, Fred J Biasini, Vanessa Thorsten, Sangappa M Dhaded, Desiree M de Jong, Elwyn Chomba, Omrana Pasha, Shivaprasad Goudar, Dennis Wallace, Hrishikesh Chakraborty, Linda L Wright, Elizabeth McClure, Waldemar A Carlo

Abstract

The positive effects of early developmental intervention (EDI) on early child development have been reported in numerous controlled trials in a variety of countries. An important aspect to determining the efficacy of EDI is the degree to which dosage is linked to outcomes. However, few studies of EDI have conducted such analyses. This observational cohort study examined the association between treatment dose and children's development when EDI was implemented in three low and low-middle income countries as well as demographic and child health factors associated with treatment dose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Psychology 18 12%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,034,379
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,467
of 3,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,902
of 265,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#21
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.