↓ Skip to main content

The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from a MANTRA-PAF substudy.

Overview of attention for article published in Europace, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from a MANTRA-PAF substudy.
Published in
Europace, October 2014
DOI 10.1093/europace/euu188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aronsson M, Walfridsson H, Janzon M, Walfridsson U, Nielsen JC, Hansen PS, Johannessen A, Raatikainen P, Hindricks G, Kongstad O, Pehrson S, Englund A, Hartikainen J, Mortensen LS, Levin LA

Abstract

The aim of this prospective substudy was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as first-line treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,425,692
of 4,414,439 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#345
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,297
of 122,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,414,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.